create a plan agreement – me31l, edit -me32l, display – ME33L, release- me35l. mainly delivery plan at me38. The schedule agreement was released by the manager and buyer, after registration in ME33L, we can see that both released code have been affected and the exit status is ok (released) Can you advise me why the amount provided in the delivery plan is not equal to the amount of GR? For example.B. we have a few cases where buyers change PO rates for current validity and we are not now able to track the old and new rates in the history of the planning contract. I am able to change the net price of the appointment agreement in ME33L here I want to set up a sub-convention cycle, but instaed the use of SUB-committee PO, I would use sheduling agreement for this. We have a delivery plan (ME33L) that is in the source list (ME03). In the delivery plan, a price was maintained. But while the NRM does, it takes another price. What`s causing it? Please advise. Delivery plan released and backed up and again I saw the release state in ME33L I established a delivery plan for a lender in ME31L. After checking in, when I went to ME33L, the CREATEd SA could not be displayed. An item in a delivery plan may have multiple prices with corresponding validity periods. Path 4Logistics → Production → DRP → Environment → Scheduling agreement → Display Hi Nagaraj, If you use a type of document that allows time-related conditions, it is not possible to update these delivery costs during the creation of SA.
However, if you have cond records for delivery fees, you can see this after creating the agreement using the display transaction (ME33L), which is at the price simulation of the item-> and you can view the costs. If you have a… I try to change the target amount (ekpo-ktmng) in an article of a delivery plan (you can see it in the ME33L transaction). To follow the changes in the delivery plan, please follow the following path: In which tables can I find these periods of validity of terms and value? How are all the terms of an article of agreement determined? answers.sap.com/questions/10496796/source-list-scheduling-agreement-is-this-normal.html The valid price you are referring to is the standard price of the material? The current standard price is stored in MBEW while historical data is in MBEWH. Switch to Sorry content, but you`re trying to access SCN content that hasn`t been migrated to the new SAP community experience. … This is very confusing because THE technical information of ME33L leads to the RV13A structure, but no reference to a database table… However, there have been times when an invoice with the January invoice date had to be booked and it was not working because the current valid price is 30, but the billing price is 50.
in the VAKEY field, enter your contract (10 characters like EKKO/EKPO zeroes or the following spaces) and contract line (5 characters with head zeros). Look at KVEWE (A in my case) and KOTABNR (16 in my case) now connect the two (A016 add zero in between) now it`s the condition table. You already have an active moderator warning for this content. Appendixes: Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 Mb and a total of 10.5 Mb. . Get KNUMV of EKKO (Condition Document Number) I hope someone has already seen this stuff and can let us know where he can look. MRP pushes back our delivery plans over and over again, although it is recommended to redefine them. What we would like to do is for MRP to leave these schedules quiet so that they move inside the fence and are automatically blocked. Here`s what`s happening: here we want to draw your attention to the ME33L transaction code in SAP. As we know, it is used in the SAP MM-PUR component (purchase in MM) which is part of the mm module (material management). ME33L is a booking code used for SAP`s delivery plan.